Curated Resource ( ? )

Why Wikipedia beats Wikinews as a collaborative journalism project » Nieman Journalism Lab

my notes ( ? )

why Wikipedia has been a more successful news source than Wikinews... Wikipedia’s formulaic style and continuous format are more conducive to collaborative writing projects ... writing a news story with a lead, a coherent narrative, and a deadline is very different than writing an encyclopedia article...tension between the Wikipedia community... and the Wikinews folks ...

Wikipedia always does a very strict inverted pyramid ... a clinical just-the-facts... very formulaic... very different than writing an article where you need ... a dramatic lead...

a deadline... file the story at a certain time... to update... write a new article ... for most Wikipedians... a very tedious process ... not clear that the wiki process really gears itself towards deadlines and group narrative writing... anything beyond very formulaic... much harder to get more than two or three people to stay consistent...

Read the Full Post

The above notes were curated from the full post www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/why-wikipedia-beats-wikinews-as-a-collaborative-journalism-project/.

Related reading

More Stuff I Like

More Stuff tagged community , news , content strategy , wikipedia , editorial , wiki , co-creation , wikinews

See also: Content Strategy , Online Community Management , Social Media Strategy , Content Creation & Marketing , Communications Tactics , Media , Politics , Communications Strategy

Cookies disclaimer

MyHub.ai saves very few cookies onto your device: we need some to monitor site traffic using Google Analytics, while another protects you from a cross-site request forgeries. Nevertheless, you can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings, you grant us permission to store that information on your device. More details in our Privacy Policy.