A sad case and a perverse judgement. Man disappears in 2011, not declared dead until 2020, with consequences for inheritance etc.

Important analysis.

Important analysis.

When the Court justified eugenics.

'This is a dispute between a tattoo artist and a retailer of cacti about the use of the trading name "PRICK".'

Painful but compelling reading. (Do click through for the full judgements.)

Good read.

Be careful!

Ends with nice three-page summary of how Twitter works.

@SuzanneFGill on how the legal profession has changed - and must keep changing.

Heart-rending.

For once, do read the comments.

And here's why.

Appalling.

Brexiters trying to chill scientific discourse.

Good question.

Law nerdery from the UK.

Even the deluded have rights.

Making the obvious point there there is absolutely no public interest in exposing the love life of a footballer, no matter how famous.

The ECHR is very far from perfect. But a country lucky enough to enjoy the rule of law, like Britain, should think long and hard before flouting international treaties which offer perhaps the only hope of legal recourse to people in much less lucky climes. Above all (and with apologies for a very long posting) though prisons are full of nasty peop…