Curated Resource ( ? )
3 tips for understanding science journalism
Curated:
23/03/2015 from
www.cjr.org/analysis/understanding_science_journalism.php?utm_content=bufferf86b3&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
my notes ( ? )
"One of the most frustrating things about reading (or listening to) science journalism is trying to resolve contradictory claims. Coffee is good for you; no, it’s bad for you... Eating meat is good for you; no, don’t eat meat!
Some people, like many of those who oppose vaccines, ease the tension by deciding that science is all relative—just a matter of personal opinion...
at its best, science journalism works much like science... Competing claims get tested and weighed against the available evidence. There’s often room for debate about what constitutes reliable evidence. Here are three tips for navigating that debate"
- 3 tips for understanding science journalism - Columbia Journalism Review
Read the Full Post
The above notes were curated from the full post www.cjr.org/analysis/understanding_science_journalism.php?utm_content=bufferf86b3&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer.Related reading
More Stuff I Like
More Stuff tagged content , science journalism
See also: Content Strategy , Content Creation & Marketing , Communications Strategy