Some thoughts from a neuroscientist who's been kicking Bluesky's tyres: "The scientific community is once again shifting platforms... Between Mastodon’s ideals and Bluesky’s usability, we are faced with a complex landscape of compromises".
Background:
"A few weeks ago, I created a Bluesky account ... much of the neuroscience community had shifted there", including many who'd not moved to Mastodon, but since adopted Bluesky. He seems optimistic. Why?
He doesn't mention custom feeds?
But there are things he misses:
Biggest concern: while decentralisable in theory, it's not decentralised in practice, and the business model's not clear and validated, so "What guarantees are there that the platform will not be acquired, monetized, or filled with advertisements?... Much depends on how quickly and widely genuine decentralization is adopted in practice."
More Stuff I Like
More Stuff tagged science , mastodon , bluesky , atprotocol , atproto adoption
See also: Bluesky and the ATmosphere , Fediverse , Science&Technology
MyHub.ai saves very few cookies onto your device: we need some to monitor site traffic using Google Analytics, while another protects you from a cross-site request forgeries. Nevertheless, you can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings, you grant us permission to store that information on your device. More details in our Privacy Policy.