"The internet has become an extractive and fragile monoculture. But we can revitalize it using lessons learned by ecologists."
Establishes the metaphor with a story about “scientific forestry” - the late 18th century growth hacking technique that "made timber yields easier to count, predict and harvest, and meant owners no longer relied on skilled local foresters to manage forests". The first forest crop made vast fortunes, but with the second came aldsterben - a term meaning “forest death, minted to describe the result. All the same species and age, the trees were flattened in storms, ravaged by insects and disease — even the survivors were spindly and weak. Forests were now so tidy and bare, they were all but dead". Those initial fortunes turned out to be "a one-off harvesting of millennia of soil wealth built up by biodiversity and symbiosis. Complexity was the goose that laid golden eggs, and she had been slaughtered".
The same “pathology of command and control... to centralize, control and extract has driven the internet to the same fate." The "internet’s 2010s" may have been a one-off harvest, resulting in "globe-spanning data-extraction engines making huge fortunes for a tiny few. Our online spaces are not ecosystems... They’re plantations... closer ... to industrial farming ... that madden the creatures trapped within".
This concentration of power extends right into the infrastructure, reduced to a few "near-planetary duopolies... the “‘climate change’ of the Internet ecosystem.”:
These tech giants are closing off the commons that made them possible and rich, investing the vast fortunes they made there "through acquisitions, vertical integration, building proprietary networks, creating chokepoints and concentrating functions from different technical layers into a single silo of top-down control". This corrodes the resilience of the system and removes the possibility of innovation by "violating a core principle of the internet: that it does not create “permanent favorites.”"
Engineers have (apparently) failed to tackle this: "Bogged down in technical minutiae, unable to separate themselves from their employers’ interests and deeply held professional values of simplification and control". Instead, we should consider it as a "damaged and struggling ecosystem facing destruction... we need to learn from ecologists who take a whole-systems view... We don’t need to repair the internet’s infrastructure. We need to rewild it."
Rewilding: “restore healthy ecosystems by creating wild, biodiverse spaces... less interested in saving specific endangered species”, paying more attention “to the emergent properties of interactions between ‘things’ in ecosystems". It is "more than a metaphor. It’s a framework and plan ... a positive vision for the networks we want to live inside, and a shared story for how we get there."
It tells us about:
What's the solution?
More Stuff I Like
More Stuff tagged regulation , biology , complex , internet , ecosystem , surveillance , adversarial interoperability , standards , rewild
See also: Surveillance Capitalism, Social media and Polarisation (Overview) , Politics
MyHub.ai saves very few cookies onto your device: we need some to monitor site traffic using Google Analytics, while another protects you from a cross-site request forgeries. Nevertheless, you can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings, you grant us permission to store that information on your device. More details in our Privacy Policy.