Met Marc-Antoine parent via FotL, who's focused on "design of new tools and approaches to aid collective decision making", particularly under the following conditions:
Many issues have these characteristics: decisions on "national policy ... have unforeseen indirect impacts in the social fabric and the natural environment. However, decision processes ... including representative democracy do not ensure... [those] most directly affected by a decision will be able to provide input".
Those processes must be able to allow "input from as many stakeholders as possible, ensure all are heard... [and] arguments will not be ignored just because they are complex or require specialized knowledge. This, I propose, can be achieved through collective authoring of collective projects".
We don't have the tools. The closest tool is probably wikis, but they're not designed to "achieve a binding decision for its users... [Wikipedia] allows to register dissent on issues that may remain unresolved indefinitely".
In any case, no tool can solve all the issues - the best I guess one can hope for is a tool that helps a group at least find an agreed majority view, and/or perhaps several minority views.
So what would such a tool - and the associated processes - look like?
More Stuff I Like